GALBib-IGeneral

Battini, Stefano, International Organizations and Private Subjects: A Move Toward a Global Administrative Law?, IILJ Working Paper 2005/03 (Global Administrative Law Series)

This paper discusses the emergence of GAL by means of a discussion of the breakdown of dualist approaches to international law, and the idea that only states could be full subjects thereof. The paper argues that a crisis in dualism has been brought about by the external effects of domestic decision-making, and the domestic impact of the activities of international organizations, discussing the examples of food saftey (and the Codex Alimentarius); banking (the Basel Committee and the IMF/World Bank); and workers' rights (the ILO). It then outlines the "guiding principles" of GAL: transparency; pariticpation; accountability and review.

Battini, Stefano, Amministrazioni senza stato: profili di diritto amministrativo internazionale (2003)

This entry has not yet been annotated.

Casini, Lorenzo, Diritto amministrativo globale, in Dizionario di diritto pubblico (Sabino Cassese, ed., 2006)

This entry has not yet been annotated.

Cassese, Sabino, Administrative Law Without the State? The Challenge of Global Regulation, 37 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 663 (2005)

This entry has not yet been annotated.

Cassese, Sabino, The Globalization of Law, 37 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 973 (2005)

This entry has not yet been annotated.

Cassese, Sabino, et. al., eds., Global Administrative Law: Cases, Materials, Issues (2nd edition 2008)

This entry has not yet been annotated.

Chimni, Bhupinder Singh, Co-Option and Resistance: Two Faces of Global Administrative Law, 37 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 799 (2005)

This entry has not yet been annotated.

della Cananea, Giacinto, Beyond the State: The Europeanization and Globalization of Procedural Administrative Law, 9 European Public Law 563 (2003)

This entry has not yet been annotated.

Esty, Daniel C., Good Governance at the Supranational Scale: Globalizing Administrative Law, 115 Yale Law Journal 1490 (2006)

This article provides a detailed overview of the field of GAL and the elements of global governance that have driven its emergence. It discusses various types of legitimacy (democratic, order-based, results-based, systemic, deliberative, and procedural), before going on to outline the elements of the GAL toolbox, relating to controls on corruption and special interests; systematic rulemaking; transparency and participation; and power-sharing, before outlining a number of challenges that GAL must confront (including informality, the role of private actors, and accusations of Western bias). It also looks at the practice of the WTO, OECD, WHO, UNEP and the North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation.

Harlow, Carol, Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values, 17 European Journal of International Law 187 (2006)

This entry has not yet been annotated.

Kingsbury, Benedict, Nico Krisch and Richard B. Stewart, The Emergence of Global Administrative Law, 68 Law & Contemporary Problems 15 (2005)

This is the article that launched and framed the GAL Project. It offers definitions of both the concept and the field of global administrative law, and makes a number of suggestions as to directions for further research. It introduces the idea of the emerging "global administrative space", before outlining five different types of global administration to which GAL can attach: that carried out by international organizations, by transational regulatory networks, by domestic bodies administering global regimes, by hybrid public-private bodies, and by purely private bodies. It discusses the scope, sources and subjects of the emerging GAL, and provides a taxonomy of mechanisms through which it can be operationalised, before sketching the principles of GAL - transparency and participation; reasoned decisions; review; and some substantive standards (such as proportionality, legitimate expectations, etc.) Issues of immunities are also discussed. The article suggests three possible normative bases for GAL - increasing intra-regiem accountability; protecting rights; and implementing democracy, and then discusses some of the possibilities and challenges it faces in terms of institutional design.

Kingsbury, Benedict, Nico Krisch, Richard B. Stewart & Jonathan Weiner, Foreword: Global Governance as Administration - National and Transnational Approaches to Global Administrative Law, 68 Law & Contemporary Problems 1 (2005)

This entry has not yet been annotated.

Krisch, Nico, and Benedict Kingsbury, Introduction: Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Legal Order, 17 European Journal of International Law 1 (2006)