I. The Field of Global Administrative Law
A. General Works
Item 1
This paper discusses the emergence of GAL by means of a discussion of the breakdown of dualist approaches to international law, and the idea that only states could be full subjects thereof. The paper argues that a crisis in dualism has been brought about by the external effects of domestic decision-making, and the domestic impact of the activities of international organizations, discussing the examples of food saftey (and the Codex Alimentarius); banking (the Basel Committee and the IMF/World Bank); and workers' rights (the ILO). It then outlines the "guiding principles" of GAL: transparency; pariticpation; accountability and review.
Item 2
This entry has not yet been annotated.
Item 3
This entry has not yet been annotated.
Item 4
This entry has not yet been annotated.
Item 5
This entry has not yet been annotated.
Item 6
This entry has not yet been annotated.
Item 7
Cassese, Sabino, Is There a Global Administrative Law?, in The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions, Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht 210 (Armin von Bogdandy et al., eds., 2010)This entry has not yet been annotated.
Item 8
Chesterman, Simon, Globalization Rules: Accountability, Power and the Prospects for Global Administrative Law 14 Global Governance 39 (2008)
This entry has not yet been annotated.
Item 9
This entry has not yet been annotated.
Item 10
This entry has not yet been annotated.
Item 11
This article provides a detailed overview of the field of GAL and the elements of global governance that have driven its emergence. It discusses various types of legitimacy (democratic, order-based, results-based, systemic, deliberative, and procedural), before going on to outline the elements of the GAL toolbox, relating to controls on corruption and special interests; systematic rulemaking; transparency and participation; and power-sharing, before outlining a number of challenges that GAL must confront (including informality, the role of private actors, and accusations of Western bias). It also looks at the practice of the WTO, OECD, WHO, UNEP and the North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation.
Item 12
This entry has not yet been annotated.
Item 13
This is the article that launched and framed the GAL Project. It offers definitions of both the concept and the field of global administrative law, and makes a number of suggestions as to directions for further research. It introduces the idea of the emerging "global administrative space", before outlining five different types of global administration to which GAL can attach: that carried out by international organizations, by transational regulatory networks, by domestic bodies administering global regimes, by hybrid public-private bodies, and by purely private bodies. It discusses the scope, sources and subjects of the emerging GAL, and provides a taxonomy of mechanisms through which it can be operationalised, before sketching the principles of GAL - transparency and participation; reasoned decisions; review; and some substantive standards (such as proportionality, legitimate expectations, etc.) Issues of immunities are also discussed. The article suggests three possible normative bases for GAL - increasing intra-regiem accountability; protecting rights; and implementing democracy, and then discusses some of the possibilities and challenges it faces in terms of institutional design.
Item 14
This entry has not yet been annotated.
Item 15
Kingsbury, Benedict, The Administrative Law Frontier in Global Governance, 99 American Society of International Law Proceedings 143 (2005)This entry has not yet been annotated.
Item 16
Krisch, Nico, and Benedict Kingsbury, Introduction: Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Legal Order, 17 European Journal of International Law 1 (2006)
This entry has not yet been annotated.
Item 17
Mitchell, Andrew D and John Farnik, Global Administrative Law: Can it bring Global Governance to Account? 37 Federal Law Review 237 (2009)
This entry has not yet been annotated.
Item 18
Mager, Ute, International Composite Administration, in The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions, Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht 210 (Armin von Bogdandy et al., eds., 2010)This entry has not yet been annotated.
Item 19
This entry has not yet been annotated.
Item 20
This entry has not yet been annotated.
Item 21
Stewart, Richard B., Accountability, Participation and the Problem of Disregard in Global Regulatory Governance (forthcoming)This entry has not yet been annotated.
This entry has not yet been annotated.
Item 23
von Bogdandy, Armin, General Principles of International Public Authority: Sketching a Research Field, in The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions, Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht 210 (Armin von Bogdandy et al., eds., 2010)This entry has not yet been annotated.
Item 24
von Bogdandy, Armin and Philipp Dann, International Composite Administration: Conceptualizing Multi-Level and Network Aspects in the Exercise of International Public Authority, in The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions, Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht 210 (Armin von Bogdandy et al., eds., 2010)This entry has not yet been annotated.




